Cornell notes are a note-taking method that divides each page into three parts: a wide column for the notes you take in class, a narrow left-hand cue column for questions you add afterward, and a short summary at the bottom. To study, you cover the notes and answer the cue questions from memory.
Walter Pauk, a longtime Cornell University education professor who directed its reading and study skills center, devised the system in the 1950s and popularized it in his 1962 book How to Study in College. It has outlasted most study fads because the layout builds two good habits: reviewing your notes soon after class, and testing yourself instead of rereading.
Below you'll find the layout, a filled-in example from an intro psychology lecture, a template you can copy, and, at the end, the review routine that turns the cue column into a self-quiz.
What are Cornell notes?
A Cornell page has three zones, and each one is filled in at a different time.
| Section | When | What goes there |
|---|---|---|
| Notes (right, two-thirds) | During class | Main ideas, examples, quick diagrams |
| Cues (left, one-third) | Same day, after class | Questions and key terms that point to the notes |
| Summary (bottom, ~5 lines) | Same day, after class | The page's main point in two or three sentences |
The order is what separates Cornell notes from an ordinary notebook. You capture first, come back and turn what you captured into questions, then test yourself on those questions. The cue column stays blank during class.
How to take Cornell notes, step by step
Study guides often summarize Pauk's process as the five Rs: record, reduce, recite, reflect, and review. The steps below follow them, with setup and the summary split out.
Step 1: Set up the page
Draw a vertical line about a third of the way in from the left edge. Leave the bottom five or so lines (about two inches) for the summary. Write the course, date, and lecture topic at the top. Rule a few pages before class so you aren't drawing lines while the lecturer talks.
Step 2: Record (during class)
Write in the notes column only. Use short phrases, not full sentences, and skip a line between ideas so you have room to add things later. Put a "?" next to anything you didn't follow. If the slides will be posted, don't copy them: write what the lecturer says that isn't on the slide, such as the example, the explanation, the "this will be on the exam." Our guide on how to take lecture notes covers in-class capture in more detail.
Step 3: Reduce (the same day)
Within a day, read through the notes. Fill gaps and answer your "?" marks from the textbook or a classmate. Then, beside each chunk of notes, write a question in the cue column that the chunk answers: one cue per idea, not one per line. Writing the questions forces you to decide what each chunk is actually about.
Step 4: Summarize
At the bottom, write two or three sentences that capture the page's main point. If you can't, you don't understand the material yet, which is better to learn now than the week of the exam.
Step 5: Recite
Cover the notes column, answer each cue out loud, then uncover and check. Put a dot next to every cue you missed or only half answered.
Step 6: Reflect and review
Add a line connecting this lecture to earlier ones ("Extinction looks like forgetting, but spontaneous recovery shows it isn't"). Then recite again over the following days. The full review routine is at the end of this guide.
Cornell notes example: an intro psychology lecture
Here is one filled-in page from a lecture on classical conditioning. The right column is what you'd write in class; the left column and summary were added that evening.
| Cues (added after class) | Notes (taken in class) |
|---|---|
| How did Pavlov stumble on classical conditioning? | Pavlov, Russian physiologist, studying digestion in dogs. Dogs started salivating before food arrived (at footsteps, the lab assistant) |
| What are the UCS and the UCR? | UCS = unconditioned stimulus, triggers a response with no learning (food). UCR = the unlearned response (salivating to food) |
| How does a neutral stimulus become a CS? | NS (e.g. a metronome) presented just before food, many times. Afterward the sound alone → salivation. Sound is now the CS, salivation to it is the CR. This phase = acquisition |
| What happens if the CS keeps appearing without the UCS? | Extinction: CR weakens and fades |
| What does spontaneous recovery tell us about extinction? | After a rest, the extinguished CR comes back (weaker). Learning was suppressed, not erased |
| Generalization vs discrimination: what's the difference? | Generalization: similar stimuli also trigger the CR (similar tones). Discrimination: learning to respond only to the real CS |
| What did the Little Albert study show? | Watson & Rayner: infant shown a white rat + loud noise → fear of the rat, which spread to other furry things. Unethical by today's standards |
| Why is taste aversion an exception? | ? Prof mentioned "Garcia": aversion forms after ONE pairing, even hours later. Check textbook ch. on learning |
Summary: Classical conditioning is learning by association: when a neutral stimulus is repeatedly paired with one that already triggers a reflex, the neutral stimulus alone comes to trigger a similar response. The learned response fades if the pairing stops but can return after a break, so extinction suppresses learning rather than erasing it.
What makes this page easy to study from: every cue is a question an exam could ask, not a label like "Extinction"; no cue gives away its answer; and the unresolved taste-aversion row keeps its "?" so the answer gets checked and then tested.
Free Cornell notes template
Copy this into a document, or use it as a guide for ruling a paper page:
Course: _________ Lecture: _________ Date: _____
--------------------------------------------------
CUES (after class) | NOTES (during class)
~1/3 of the width | ~2/3 of the width
|
Q: _______________ | - Main idea
| - detail / example
| - ? anything unclear
|
Q: _______________ | - Main idea
| - detail / example
--------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY (2-3 sentences, own words, notes closed):
--------------------------------------------------
Missed on recall (dates): ________________________
How to set it up on paper or digitally
- Paper: rule pages in advance or print the template. To recite, fold the page along the line.
- Google Docs or Word: a two-column table with the left column a third of the width, plus a merged bottom row for the summary. Save the page as a .docx file and you can also make flashcards from the Word document.
- iPad (GoodNotes, Notability): import a Cornell page as a PDF template, or draw the lines once and duplicate the page.
- Notion or Obsidian: a toggle or folded callout does the cue column's job: the question shows, the answer stays hidden until you open it. See Notion for studying.
Paper or screen matters less than you may have heard. A well-known 2014 study found that students who handwrote their notes did better on conceptual questions than laptop users, but a 2021 replication found no clear difference in quiz scores. A 2024 meta-analysis of 24 studies found a small edge for handwriting on achievement (g = 0.25). Pick the format you won't get distracted on.
Cornell notes for math, science, and other subjects
The three zones stay the same; what goes in them changes.
- Math and physics: put worked examples in the notes column, one step per line. Cues become "When do I use the chain rule instead of the product rule?" or a fresh problem to solve. The summary lists the method's steps. For more, see how to study math.
- Biology and anatomy: sketch diagrams in the notes column. Cues become "Trace blood from the right atrium to the aorta" or "Label the parts of a nephron," answered by drawing on scrap paper.
- History and social sciences: cues become "why" and "what changed" questions ("Why did the Treaty of Versailles anger Germany?"). The summary states the argument, not just events.
- Textbook reading: Cornell pairs well with the SQ3R reading method: your SQ3R questions go in the cue column and your recited answers on the right.
Not sure Cornell suits your classes? Our comparison of note-taking methods shows when outlines, maps, or charts fit better.
Do Cornell notes actually work?
The layout itself has little direct research behind it; the habits it builds have a lot. The best-documented test we found is small. In a 2012 classroom study, two sections of a high school child development course were compared over three unit tests: one section was taught Cornell notes and required to use them, and the other took notes however they liked. With 16 students per section, scores were essentially identical.
Cornell notes vs students' own method, three unit tests
Average unit test scores in two high school child development sections, 16 students each
- Own method
- Cornell notes
View data
| Unit test | Own method | Cornell notes |
|---|---|---|
| Unit 3 | 76.8% | 75.3% |
| Unit 4 | 89.3% | 87.8% |
| Unit 5 | 83.4% | 83.1% |
The authors noted they had no way to tell whether students actually studied from their notes. Still, it fits what you'd expect: a page layout on its own doesn't change much. What has strong evidence is what you do with the page:
- Reviewing notes matters more than taking them. A 2006 meta-analysis of 33 studies found that taking notes and reviewing them had a substantial effect on learning. An earlier analysis of 57 studies found that the benefit of taking notes on its own was modest.
- Self-testing beats rereading. In Roediger and Karpicke's 2006 study, students who read a passage once and then took a recall test remembered 56% of it a week later, versus 42% for students who read it twice. Covering your notes and answering the cues is the same kind of test. Our active recall guide covers the wider evidence.
So Cornell notes work to the extent that you use the cue column. If you never cover the right side and quiz yourself, they're ordinary notes with a wide margin.
Common Cornell notes mistakes
- Writing cues during class. You'll miss what the lecturer says next, and same-day cues are better because you can see the whole lecture.
- Topic labels instead of questions. "Extinction" gives you nothing to answer. "What happens to the CR when the metronome keeps sounding without food?" does.
- Cues that contain the answer. "Extinction means the CR fades" is a note, not a cue.
- Skipping the summary. It takes two minutes and shows you whether you understood the page.
- Rereading instead of reciting. The most common mistake, and the one that matters most.
How to study from Cornell notes: a one-week review routine
Most students write cues, then study by rereading the notes column. That throws away the point of the layout. The cue column exists so you can practice retrieval: pulling the answer out of memory before you see it. Each review session goes like this:
- Cover the notes column. Fold the page, or lay a sheet of paper over it.
- Answer each cue out loud or in writing. Say a full answer, not "I know this one."
- Uncover and check. Be strict: a vague answer counts as a miss.
- Mark misses. A dot by the cue, or a date on the "missed" line of the template.
- Re-quiz only the marked cues at the end of the session, then the whole page on the next review.
Spread the sessions out instead of doing them all at once:
| When | What to do |
|---|---|
| Same day | Write cues and summary, then one recite pass |
| Next day | Recite the whole page from the cues |
| About 3 days later | Recite the marked cues, plus a quick pass over the rest |
| 1 week later | Whole page from the cues, then the summary from memory |
| Before the exam | Mix cues from several lectures in random order |
The spaced repetition guide explains why these gaps work. Cues you miss twice are worth turning into flashcards: each cue is already a card front, and our notes-to-flashcards workflow shows how to do it quickly.
Frequently asked questions
What are the 5 Rs of Cornell notes?
Record, reduce, recite, reflect, and review. Record your notes in the right column during class. Reduce them afterward by writing questions and key terms in the cue column, plus a summary. Recite by covering the notes and answering the cues from memory. Reflect by connecting the material to what you already know. Review by repeating the recitation over the following days and weeks.
What do you write in the cue column?
Questions that the notes beside them answer, written after class. Good cues are the questions an exam could ask: "How does a neutral stimulus become a conditioned stimulus?" rather than "Conditioning." Key terms, formulas to state, and diagrams to redraw also work. Avoid cues that contain their own answer, because then covering the notes tests nothing.
Are Cornell notes effective?
The layout alone has little direct research behind it, and one small classroom study found no difference from students' own methods. The parts of the method that are well supported are reviewing notes soon after class and testing yourself from the cue column instead of rereading. Use the cue column for self-quizzing and you get the benefit; skip it and you mostly don't.
Can you do Cornell notes on an iPad or laptop?
Yes. On an iPad, import a Cornell page as a PDF template in GoodNotes or Notability. On a laptop, use a two-column table in Google Docs or Word, or Notion toggles that hide the answer under the question. Whatever you use, you need a quick way to hide the notes column and quiz yourself.
Do Cornell notes work for math?
They can, with adjustments. Put worked examples step by step in the notes column, and use the cue column for "when do I use this method?" questions or a new problem of the same type. The summary should list the steps of the method. For math, solving fresh problems from the cues matters more than reciting definitions.
How long should a Cornell notes summary be?
Two to four sentences per page is enough. It should state the page's main idea and how the details connect, in your own words, written without looking at the notes if you can. If you can't summarize a page in a few sentences, that tells you which part of the lecture to revisit before you move on.
Sources and further reading
Start with the primary research and official guidance below. Links open in a new tab so you can compare the evidence with the article.
- Read source
Take Note: Popular Study Method has 'Cornell' Written All Over It
Cornellians, Cornell University, 2022
- Read source
The Impact of the Cornell Note-Taking Method on Students' Performance in a High School Family and Consumer Sciences Class
Quintus et al., Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education, 2012
- Read source
What limits the encoding effect of note-taking? A meta-analytic examination
Kobayashi, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2005
- Read source
Combined effects of note-taking/-reviewing on learning and the enhancement through interventions: a meta-analytic review
Kobayashi, Educational Psychology, 2006
- Read source
Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention
Roediger & Karpicke, Psychological Science, 2006
- Read source
The pen is mightier than the keyboard: advantages of longhand over laptop note taking
Mueller & Oppenheimer, Psychological Science, 2014
- Read source
Don't ditch the laptop just yet: A direct replication of Mueller and Oppenheimer's (2014) Study 1 plus mini meta-analyses across similar studies
Urry et al., Psychological Science, 2021
- Read source
Typed versus handwritten lecture notes and college student achievement: A meta-analysis
Flanigan et al., Educational Psychology Review, 2024
